HP HP2-E15 : HP BladeSystem Sales Consultant Exam
Exam Dumps Organized by Curtis
Latest 2021 Updated HP2-E15 test questions | examcollection with genuine Questions
100% valid HP2-E15 Real Questions - Updated Daily - 100% Pass Guarantee
HP2-E15 test questions Source : Download 100% Free HP2-E15 Dumps PDF and VCE
Test Number : HP2-E15
Test Name : HP BladeSystem Sales Consultant
Vendor Name : HP
Update : Click Here to Check Latest Update
Question Bank : Check Questions
100% obtain free HP2-E15 PDF Questions and Practice Test
killexams. com HP BladeSystem Sales Consultant exam is definitely easy through HP2-E15 Practice Questions. Most of it need to register regarding killexams internet site, choose the HP2-E15 exam with list together with register. The good news is little payment for that. obtain and install HP2-E15 examcollection and exam Cram. Look over and memorize HP2-E15 PDF Dumps from EBOOK file. Procedure with VCE software together with take the genuine HP2-E15 analyze. That's most of.
Sometime, pass the very exam does not matter at all, however understanding the ideas are required. This is exactly situation throughout HP2-E15 exam. They provide real exams questions along with answers involving HP2-E15 exam that will help you have good credit report scoring in the exam, but issue is not just spending the HP2-E15 exam a long time. They provide VCE exam simulator to Excellerate your understanding about HP2-E15 syllabus for you to understand the heart concepts involving HP2-E15 objectives. This is really needed. It is not whatsoever easy. All of us has well prepared HP2-E15 questions bank which may actually provide you great understanding of ideas, along with surety to pass the very exam initially attempt. Never ever under imagine the power of each of their HP2-E15 VCE exam simulator. This will enable you to lot understand and memorizing HP2-E15 questions with its PDF DownloadLIBRO and VCE.
You will really really astonished when you will dsicover their HP2-E15 exam questions on the real HP2-E15 exam screen. That is certainly real wonder. You will be sure to to think which, you are going to have high credit report scoring in HP2-E15 exam simply because, you know the many answers. You have got practiced by using VCE exam simulator. Looking for complete pool area of HP2-E15 PDF Dumps that may be downloaded while you register for killexams. com and choose the HP2-E15 exam to acquire. With a 4 months future free updates involving HP2-E15 exam, you can plan your real HP2-E15 exam within which period. Allow me to explain feel comfortable, only just extend your company's HP2-E15 acquire account abilities. But keep in touch with their workforce. They post on HP2-E15 questions as soon as they are simply changed throughout real HP2-E15 exam. Crucial, they have logical and up thus far HP2-E15 Latest Questions all the time. Basically plan the next certification exam and sign-up to acquire your reproduce of HP2-E15 Latest Questions.
Saving bit sometime develop a big great loss. This is the situation when you understand free material and try to cross HP2-E15 exam. Many amazed are watching for you for genuine HP2-E15 exam. Small-scale saving bring about big great loss. You should not trust on free material when you are visiting appear pertaining to HP2-E15 exam. It is not a piece of cake to pass HP2-E15 exam by using just text message books or possibly course books. You need to experience the confusing scenarios throughout HP2-E15 exam. These questions are included in killexams. com HP2-E15 Study Guide. Their HP2-E15 questions bank or investment company make your prep for exam far effortless than before. Basically obtain HP2-E15 Latest Questions and initiate studying. You are going to feel that your understanding is improvedadvanced to great extent.
Parts of Killexams HP2-E15 Latest Questions
-> HP2-E15 Latest Questions obtain Admittance in just a few min.
-> Total HP2-E15 Questions Bank
-> HP2-E15 exam Being successful Guarantee
-> Confirmed genuine HP2-E15 exam questions
-> Latest or longer to date HP2-E15 Questions along with Answers
-> Confirmed HP2-E15 Answers
-> obtain HP2-E15 exam Data files anywhere
-> Lots of HP2-E15 VCE exam Simulator Access
-> Lots of HP2-E15 exam Download
-> Wonderful Discount Coupons
-> hundred percent Secure Get
-> 100% Secret.
-> 100% Cost-free exam Questions pertaining to evaluation
-> Basically no Hidden Price
-> No Every month Subscription
-> Basically no Auto Renewal
-> HP2-E15 exam Bring up to date Intimation by means of Email
-> Cost-free Technical Support
Exam Detail for: https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/HP2-E15
Pricing Specifics at: https://killexams.com/exam-price-comparison/HP2-E15
See Complete Number: https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list
Price reduction Coupon upon Full HP2-E15 Latest Questions questions;
WC2020: 60 per cent Flat Price reduction on each exam
PROF17: 10% Further Price reduction on Cost Greater compared to $69
DEAL17: 15% Further more Discount upon Value Higher than $99
HP2-E15 exam Format | HP2-E15 Course Contents | HP2-E15 Course Outline | HP2-E15 exam Syllabus | HP2-E15 exam Objectives
Killexams Review | Reputation | Testimonials | Feedback
Save your time and money, study these HP2-E15 Questions and Answers and take the exam.
As I had one and simplest weeks time nearby ahead of the exam HP2-E15. Therefore , I relied on after the Questions and Answers of killexams.com just for quick guide. It comprised quick-duration responses in a systemic way. substantial thanks to one, you convert my intercontinental. that is the very best exam answer in the event that I did confined occasion.
How many questions are asked in HP2-E15 exam?
I was the use of the killexams.com for a while to all the exams. Yesterday morning, I handed down with a good score inside of HP2-E15 exam by way of making use of the Questions and even Answers examine sources. I put some worries on subject areas, however the product passed my doubts. Ankle sprain without problems seen the answer for all the doubts and even troubles. Thank you for providing all of us the dependable and reliable material. It is the pleasant products as I discover.
Proper here is proper material latestmodern dumps, correct answers.
Merely passed the very HP2-E15 exam with this braindump. I can confirm that it is 00% valid plus includes almost the entire package years versions. I exclusively got 3 question unsuitable, so very exciting plus relieved.
Forestall worrying anymore for HP2-E15 study.
Best HP2-E15 exam instruction I have ever previously come upon. I flushed HP2-E15 exam hassle free. Certainly no stress, virtually no issues, without any frustrations throughout the HP2-E15 exam. Thta i knew of the whole thing Required to recognise through killexams.com HP2-E15 Questions. The questions are correct, and I heard from my friend which will their repayment certain
is effective, too. They may provide you with the money back in case you not work, however the element is, they create it very smooth to secure.
HP2-E15 examcollection that works!
killexams.com HP2-E15 braindump functions. All questions are appropriate and the answers are right. well worth the money. I flushed my HP2-E15 exam excess week.
HP BladeSystem PDF Braindumps
After engaging in a couple of benchmarks, Microsoft concluded that .web presents greater efficiency and price-performance ratio than WebSphere. IBM rebutted Microsoft’s findings and performed other assessments proving that WebSphere is superior to .web. Microsoft responded via rejecting some of IBM’s claims as false and repeating the assessments on different hardware with diverse outcomes.
Microsoft has benchmarked .web and WebSphere and posted the benchmark supply code, run guidelines, use rules and a findings file published at wholoveswindows.com entitled Benchmarking IBM WebSphere 7 on IBM Power6 and AIX vs. Microsoft .internet on HP BladeSystem and home windows Server 2008. This benchmark indicates a an awful lot bigger transactions per second (TPS) price and greater charge/performance ratio when the use of WebSphere 7 on home windows Server 2008 over WebSphere on AIX 5.three, and even more suitable results when using .internet on windows Server 2008 over WebSphere on the same OS. The cost/performance ratio for the software benchmark used is:
IBM vigour 570 with WebSphere 7 and AIX 5.three
HP BladeSystem C7000 with WebSphere 7 and home windows Server 2008
HP BladeSystem C7000 with .web and windows Server 2008
IBM has rebutted Microsoft’s benchmark and referred to as some of their claims as false, and carried out a different benchmark, with distinctive effects. The benchmark used along with the findings have been posted in Benchmarking AND BEATING Microsoft’s .web three.5 with WebSphere 7! (PDF). The supply code of the benchmark became now not published. The effects show WebSphere as a more robust performing center-tier than .internet with 36% greater TPS for one utility benchmark and from 176% to 450% stronger throughput for considered one of IBM’s ordinary benchmarks.
Microsoft replied to IBM and defended their claims and benchmarking results with Response to IBM’s Whitepaper Entitled Benchmarking and Beating Microsoft .net 3.5 with WebSphere 7 (PDF). Microsoft has additionally re-run their benchmark, modified to encompass a distinct check circulation comparable to the one used through IBM of their tests, running it on diverse hardware, a single multi-core server, founding that indeed WebSphere is greater than .web if using IBM’s look at various flow but best somewhat more suitable, between 3% and %6, now not as suggested by IBM. besides that, these later findings don't exchange the normal ones due to the fact that the benchmark changed into run on a distinct hardware configuration. within the end, Microsoft invites IBM to “an impartial lab to function additional testing”.
Microsoft checking out .net in opposition t WebSphere
Microsoft has conducted a sequence of assessments evaluating WebSphere/Java against .net on three distinctive platforms. The particulars of the benchmarks performed and the verify effects were published in the whitepaper entitled Benchmarking IBM WebSphere® 7 on IBM® Power6™ and AIX vs. Microsoft® .internet on Hewlett Packard BladeSystem and windows Server® 2008 (PDF).
IBM vigour 570 (vigour 6) working IBM WebSphere 7 on AIX 5.3
eight IBM Power6 cores at 4.2GHz
32 GB RAM
4 x 1 GB NICs
Hewlett Packard BladeSystem C7000 running IBM WebSphere 7 on home windows Server 2008
4 Hewlett Packard ProLiant BL460c blades
One Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® E5450 (three.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 80W) Processor/blade
32 GB RAM/blade
windows Server 2008/64-bit/blade
2 x 1 GB NICs/blade
Hewlett Packard BladeSystem C7000 operating .net on windows Server 2008
identical as the old one but the functions validated run on .web as a substitute of WebSphere.
a few three tests were performed on every platform:
change web utility Benchmarking The purposes established had been IBM’s trade 6.1 and Microsoft’s StockTrader 2.04. This collection of tests have evaluated the efficiency of finished information-pushed internet functions running on top of the above mentioned systems. The net pages accessed had one or continually greater operations serviced with the aid of courses contained with the aid of the enterprise layer and ending with synchronous database calls.
trade center Tier net functions Benchmarking This benchmark turned into supposed to measure the efficiency of the web provider layer executing operations which ended up in database transactions. The test become comparable to internet application, but operations have been counted for my part.
WS check internet services Benchmarking This examine turned into just like the outdated one but there changed into no company logic nor database entry. This was based on WSTest workload at the beginning devised by means of sun and augmented by Microsoft. The features tier provided 3 operations: EchoList, EchoStruct and GetOrder. Having no company common sense, the test measured simplest the raw efficiency of the net provider software.
Two database configurations had been used, one for the all-IBM platform and a further for the other two: IBM DB2 V9.5 commercial enterprise version with IBM DB2 V9.5 JDBC drivers for data access and SQL Server 2008 databases business version. Two databases were installation for each configuration running on HP BL680c G5 blades:
4 Quad-Core Intel XEON CPUs, @2.4GHZ (sixteen cores in every blade)
64 GB RAM
four x 1GB NICs
IBM DB 9.5 enterprise version 64-bit or Microsoft SQL Server 2008 sixty four-bit
Microsoft home windows Server 2008 sixty four-bit, enterprise version
2 4GB HBAs for fiber/sans access to the EVA 4400 storage
The storage changed into secured on HP StorageWorks EVA 4400 Disk Array:
96 15K drives complete
4 logical volumes which include 24 drives every
Database server 1: Logical extent 1 for logging
Database server 1: Logical volume 2 for database
Database server 2: Logical quantity 3 for logging
Database server 2: Logical volume four for database
The net software benchmark used 32 client machines running test scripts. every machine simulated a whole bunch of shoppers having a 1 second think time. The tests used an tailored version of IBM’s trade 6.1 utility on SUT #1 & #2 and Microsoft’s StockTrader software on SUT #3.
For the internet carrier and WSTest benchmarks, Microsoft used 10 consumers with a 0.1s think time. For WSTest, the databases were now not accessed. Microsoft has created a WSTest-compliant benchmark for WebSphere 7 and JAX-WS and a different in C# for .web using WCF.
Microsoft’s whitepaper carries extra particulars on how the tests were conducted including the DB configuration, DB entry used, caching configuration, examine scripts, tuning parameters used and others.
The benchmarking effects together with the costs/performance ratio are proven in here desk:
IBM power 570 with WebSphere 7 and AIX 5.three
HP BladeSystem C7000 with WebSphere 7 and windows Server 2008
HP BladeSystem C7000 with .net and windows Server 2008
total center-Tier system charge
change web application Benchmark
trade core Tier net service Benchmark
WSTest EchoList check10,536 TPS
WSTest EchoStruct testeleven,378 TPS
WSTest GetOrder test11,009 TPS
in line with Microsoft’s benchmarking consequences, running WebSphere on HP BladeSystem with home windows Server 2008 is ready 30% extra productive and the charge-efficiency ratio is 5 instances reduce than working WebSphere on IBM power 570 with AIX 5.3. The .web/home windows Server 2008 configuration is even more effective and the can charge/efficiency ratio drops to half compared to WebSphere/windows Server 2008 and it's 10 instances smaller than WebSphere/vigor 570/AIX. The charge-performance ratio is so excessive for the first platform since the price of the complete middle-tier is over $250,000 while the performance is decrease than the other platforms.
Microsoft’s benchmarking whitepaper (PDF) carries an appendix with finished details of the hardware and utility expenses. The benchmarking checks used, including source code, are published on StockTrader web site.
In another paper, Benchmarking AND BEATING Microsoft’s .net 3.5 with WebSphere 7! (PDF), IBM has rejected Microsoft’s benchmark and created an additional one showing that WebSphere is performing more suitable than .web.
Microsoft had observed that StockTrader is akin to IBM’s trade utility:
Microsoft created an software it truly is functionally similar to the IBM WebSphere change application, each when it comes to user performance and center-tier database access, transactional and messaging conduct.
IBM rejected Microsoft’s claim:
The application claims to be “functionally equal” to the IBM WebSphere change 6.1 pattern software. It is not a “port” of the utility in any sense. Little, if any, of the normal application design changed into ported. Microsoft has made this an application that showcases using its proprietary technologies. an enormous indication of here's the incontrovertible fact that the .net StockTrader application isn't a universally available net software on account that it may possibly handiest be accessed through the use of cyber web Explorer, and never through different net browsers.
in addition, IBM spoke of that exchange was not designed to benchmark WebSphere’s efficiency but somewhat to
function a trial
software illustrating the usage of the aspects and features contained in WebSphere and the way they related to application performance. additionally, the utility served as a pattern which allowed developers to discover the tuning capabilities of WebSphere.
IBM had different complaints related to Microsoft’s benchmark:
Microsoft created a very new application [StockTrader] and claimed functional equivalence on the application stage. The fact is that the Microsoft edition of the software used proprietary SQL statements to entry the database, unlike the normal edition of change 6.1 which became designed to be a portable and ordinary software.
They employed customer aspect scripting to shift probably the most utility feature to the client.
They validated internet features capabilities by way of inserting an useless HTTP server between the WebSphere server and the client.
And If that became now not satisfactory, they failed to competently monitor and modify the WebSphere utility server to achieve height performance.
IBM’s competitive project office group (CPO) has ported StockTrader 2.0 to WebSphere growing CPO StockTrader and claiming: “we did a port that faithfully reproduced Microsoft’s application design. The intent became to achieve an apples-to-apples evaluation.” So, dealer 6.1 turned into ported through Microsoft from WebSphere to .internet below the name StockTrader and ported once again by using IBM returned to WebSphere below the name CPO StockTrader. IBM benchmarked CPO StockTrader towards StockTrader and received stronger outcomes for WebSphere in opposition t .internet:
IBM has additionally recommended they're using friendly financial institution, an utility intended to benchmark WebSphere towards .web. in this check WebSphere outperforms .internet a couple of instances:
in their StockTrader vs. CPO StockTrader benchmark, IBM used scripts simulating person undertaking: “login, getting fees, stock buy, stock sell, viewing of the account portfolio, then a logoff” and working in stress mode without suppose times. 36 users were simulated, adequate to power each server at optimum throughput and utilization. The statistics back become validated and errors have been discarded.
The entrance conclusion turned into applied with WebSphere 7/windows Server 2008 in one case and .internet 3.5 with IIS 7/home windows Server 2008 in the other. The back end database changed into DB2 8.2 and SQL Server 2005, each on home windows Server 2003.
The hardware used for trying out changed into:
performance checking out tool HardwareX345 8676 Server2 X three.06 GHz Intel Processor with Hyper Thread Technology8 GB RAM18.2 GB 15K rpm SCSC difficult Disk Drive1 GB Ethernet interfaceApplication Server Hardware IBM X3950 Server, eight x 3.50 Ghz, Intel Xeon Processors with Hyper Thread know-how, 64 GB RAMDatabase Server HardwareX445 8670 Server, 8x three.0 Ghz. Intel Xeon Processors with Hyper Thread expertise, sixteen GB RAMUltraSCSI 320 Controller , EXP 300 SCSI expansion Unit, 14x 18.2 GB 15K rpm hard Disk force configured as 2 Raid Arrays.One for Logs & One for Database, each and every array is created from 7 tough disks in a Raid 0 configuration.The Ethernet network spine The isolated community hardware is constructed from 3x 3Comm SuperStack 4950 switches and one three Comm SuperStack 4924 switch operating at 1 GB.
The software and hardware configuration for the pleasant financial institution benchmark became comparable to the StockTrader one.
IBM’s whitepaper consists of counsel about the friendly financial institution software, but doesn't factor to the source code. It also mentions that the application become at the beginning designed for .internet Framework 1.1 and changed into simply recompiled on .web 3.5 with out being up to date to make use of the latest technologies.
Microsoft Response to IBM’s Rebuttal
Microsoft has answered to IBM’s rebuttal in yet one more whitepaper, Response to IBM’s Whitepaper Entitled Benchmarking and Beating Microsoft .web three.5 with WebSphere 7 (PDF). during this doc, Microsoft defends their normal benchmarking outcomes and affirms that IBM made some false claims of their rebuttal document entitled Benchmarking AND BEATING Microsoft’s .internet 3.5 with WebSphere 7!, and IBM did not use an appropriate benchmarking manner. more has been posted at wholoveswindows.com.
definitely, Microsoft talked about the following claims are false:
IBM claim: The .net StockTrader doesn't faithfully reproduce the IBM change application functionality.Microsoft response: this claim is false; the .web StockTrader 2.04 faithfully reproduces the IBM WebSphere alternate application (the use of general .internet Framework technologies and coding practices), and may be used for reasonable benchmark comparisons between .internet 3.5 and IBM WebSphere 7.
IBM declare: The .net StockTrader makes use of client-aspect script to shift processing from the server to the customer.Microsoft response: this declare is false, there is not any client-aspect scripting within the .net StockTrader application.
IBM claim: The .net StockTrader uses proprietary SQL.Microsoft response: the .net StockTrader makes use of standard SQL statements coded for SQL Server and/or Oracle; and provides an information entry layer for each. The IBM WebSphere 7 alternate application similarly uses JDBC queries coded for DB2 and/or Oracle. Neither implementation makes use of kept processes or functions; all business logic runs in the application server. primary pre-organized SQL statements are utilized in each applications.
IBM declare: The .net StockTrader isn't programmed as a universally obtainable, thin-client internet utility. hence it runs best on IE, now not in Firefox or different browsers.Microsoft response: definitely, the .internet StockTrader net tier is programmed as a universally obtainable, pure skinny customer internet application. although, an easy difficulty in theuse of HTML remark tags causes issues in Firefox; these remark tags are being up-to-date to enable the ASP.web utility to correctly render in any industry normal browser, together with Firefox.
IBM claim: The .web StockTrader has error beneath load.Microsoft response: here is false, and this document contains extra benchmark checks and Mercury LoadRunner details proving this IBM declare to be false.
also, Microsoft complained that IBM had developed friendly bank for .net Framework 1.1 years ago using out of date applied sciences:
IBM’s pleasant financial institution benchmark makes use of an obsolete .net Framework 1.1 utility that includes applied sciences akin to DCOM that have been obsolete for decades. This benchmark should still be completely discounted until Microsoft has the possibility to overview the code and update it for .internet 3.5, with more moderen technologies for ASP.internet, transactions, and home windows communique groundwork (WCF) TCP/IP binary remoting (which changed DCOM because the preferred remoting expertise).
Microsoft regarded IBM failed through no longer offering the supply code for CPO StockTrader and pleasant bank purposes and reiterated the indisputable fact that the entire supply code for Microsoft’s benchmark purposes thinking
in this case had been made public.
Microsoft also observed that IBM had used a modified examine script which “included a heavier emphasis on buys and also covered a promote operation”. Microsoft re-performed their benchmark the use of IBM’s modified verify script circulation, one together with the operations purchase and promote beside Login, Portfolio, Logout, on a single four-core utility server maintaining that
these checks are based on IBM’s revised script and are meant to fulfill some of these IBM rebuttal examine situations as outlined in IBM’s response paper. They should no longer be considered in any method as a change to their common outcomes (carried out on diverse hardware, and distinct check script flow); because the original outcomes remain legitimate.
The test became carried on:
1 HP ProLiant BL460c1 Quad-core Intel Xeon E5450 CPU (three.00 GHz)32 GB RAM2 x 1GB NICsWindows Server 2008 64-bit.net 3.5 (SP1) 64-bitIBM WebSphere sixty four-bit
1 HP ProLiant DL380 G52 Quad-core Intel Xeon E5355 CPUs (2.67 GHz)64 GB RAM2 x 1GB NICsWindows Server 2008 64-bitSQL Server 2008 64-bitDB2 V9.7 sixty four-bit
The outcome of the test indicates identical efficiency for WebSphere and .internet.
one in every of IBM’s complaints had been that Microsoft inserted an unnecessary HTTP internet server in entrance of WebSphere reducing the variety of transactions per 2nd. Microsoft admitted that, but delivered:
the use of this HTTP Server changed into completely discussed within the common benchmark paper, and is carried out based on IBM’s own most reliable apply deployment guidelines for WebSphere. In this type of setup, IBM recommends using the IBM HTTP Server (Apache) as the front conclusion web Server, which then routes requests to the IBM WebSphere utility server. In their tests, they co-observed this HTTP on the identical computing device because the utility Server. here's corresponding to the .web/WCF internet carrier exams, where they hosted the WCF net features in IIS 7, with co-determined IIS 7 HTTP Server routing requests to the .internet application pool processing the WCF provider operations. So in each exams, they established an equal setup, using IBM HTTP Server (Apache) because the entrance conclusion to WebSphere/JAX-WS services; and Microsoft IIS 7 as the front end to the .web/WCF services. therefore, they stand at the back of all their long-established outcomes.
Microsoft performed yet an additional look at various, the WSTest, with out the middleman HTTP web server on a single quad-core server just like the old one, and bought right here outcomes:
each exams carried out with the aid of Microsoft on a single server exhibit WebSphere maintaining a moderate efficiency expertise over .web however no longer as an awful lot as IBM pretended in their paper. besides that, Microsoft remarked that IBM didn't comment on middle-tier charge assessment which drastically favors Microsoft.
Microsoft persevered to problem IBM to
meet us [Microsoft] in an independent lab to perform extra checking out of the .web StockTrader and WSTest benchmark workloads and pricing evaluation of the center tier software servers tested in their benchmark document. moreover, they invite the IBM competitive response crew to their lab in Redmond, for dialogue and additional trying out of their presence and beneath their overview.
commonly, a benchmark includes
a collection of guidelines describing how the workload is to be processed – run guidelines -
a technique making an attempt to make certain that the run guidelines are revered and effects are interpreted as it should be
A benchmark is constantly meant to examine two or greater systems in an effort to investigate which one is improved for performing certain projects. Benchmarks are additionally used by means of agencies to enhance their hardware/software before it goes to their consumers through trying out diverse tuning parameters and measuring the results or via spotting some bottlenecks. Benchmarks can even be used for advertising and marketing purposes, to prove that a certain system has better efficiency than the competitor’s.
in the starting, benchmarks were used to measure the hardware efficiency of a device, like the CPU processing vigour. Later, benchmarks were created to examine and examine applications like SPEC MAIL2001 and even application servers like SPECjAppServer2004.
There is no perfect benchmark. The workload will also be tweaked to favor a undeniable platform, or the facts will also be misinterpreted or incorrectly extrapolated. To be convincing, a benchmark must be as transparent as possible. The workload definition should be public, and if viable the source code should still be made available for those interested to look at. a transparent set of run guidelines are mandatory so other parties can repeat the same assessments to peer the outcomes for themselves. the way outcomes are interpreted and their which means ought to be disclosed.
We don't seem to be aware about a response from IBM to Microsoft’s closing paper. it might be interesting to see their reaction. probably, the finest approach to clear things up is for IBM to make the source code of their tests public so anybody involved could test and see for themselves the place is the fact. except then they are able to most effective speculate on the correctness and validity of these benchmarks.